PrimerMovie.com
Official Site of the movie Primer
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

I can't understand this line by Aaron
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    PrimerMovie.com Forum Index -> Movie Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
wildonrio



Joined: 11 May 2006
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 3:14 pm    Post subject: I can't understand this line by Aaron Reply with quote

This is the scene where they are talking about what Granger changed. I've underlined the line that I don't get.

837 - What do you think he changed?- Not much.

838 we didn't have any contact with him in the 3 hours he could've done anything.

839 I know he changed this. I know we weren't having this conversation the first time...

840 so you don't know what we lost.

841 It really could not have been much.

842 It doesn't matter how much. It just matters that it's changed.


Ok, so what does Aaron mean with "we didn't have any contact with him in the 3 hours he could've done anything." What 3 hours? From when to when?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pedro2112



Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 456
Location: Midwest

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 3:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

From 5pm (when presumably he got out of the box), until they saw him. Although that doesn't make sense, because it was more than three hours.
_________________
I'm in a groove.....

or is it a rut? - Neil Peart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vode



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 323
Location: Hampton, UK

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're right, that makes no sense.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
foobario



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 133

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

5pm vs 2am.

But - my favorite theory about why Granger is messed up is that he got out of the box too early (perhaps closer to when Rachel was in peril, if that is the reason he came back)... he wouldn't want to go all the way back to the beginning if he knew the part he was interested in was later in the week, or maybe he was claustrophobic or too excited and just couldn't wait. I wonder if Shane is letting slip when he thinks Granger got out, or even (cue lightning, thunder) if he's letting slip that Aaron *knows* when Granger got out. There's nothing in the film to support this idea, it's just speculation, but it's interesting.

Something's always bugged me about Aaron's "I slipped" comment, and the cut scenes of Abe running to the back of the house. I've wondered if there were other future Abes or Aarons in that scene, sort of in line with Rob Y's 'time war' idea. Did Granger really pass out, or did Aaron (3? 4?) body-check him into the fencepost to keep him from talking to Abe? Or were those 'cut-scenes' really a future Abe, and did *he* do something? Basically with Granger showing up out of nowhere, nothing can be trusted. The permutations are endless.


There's another line that bugs me - in the director's commentary, Shane says (at 33:18):
Quote:

We're actually at a Sonic drive-in, it's about 6 in the morning, but it was important to be there to be in front of those jets that are in the background, my attempt at foreshadowing where these guys are going to end up at the end of the story when we have multiple Aarons flying off to who knows where.

This is oddly phrased (but, for anyone who still doubts, does show that there are at least 3 Aarons at the end of the film). I assume he's talking about Aaron2 and Aaron3, but in my mind Aaron2 is already gone, though I suppose in the final timeline the times Aaron leaves are only a day apart, and it isn't until near the end of the film that we find out what is going on.

And, as long as I'm babbling, what about this:
Aaron2 wrote:

And if you look, you will not find me.

That's an oddly confident phrase, no? Where's he going to go? Why would the callee look? And if he looked, why would he fail?

I've been in other parts of the world, out in the middle of nowhere (off the beaten track in India, Nepal, and Cambodia) and run into people I went to school with or knew when I was very young... the world is too small to hide in, if you're limited to hiding in space.

The only place Aaron2 could go and be *guaranteed* he'd never be found is to a past farther back than anyone else can go... imagine if he just lived a single loop of time, over and over, exploring all the possibilities and permutations. He'd probably die from neural degeneration before too long. But maybe death is what he wants. In a world of passports and ID checks, being a copy of someone else who has a legitimate place in the world would pretty much suck.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hal9000



Joined: 23 Jun 2005
Posts: 361
Location: Morgantown, WV, USA

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 7:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

foobario wrote:
And, as long as I'm babbling, what about this:
Aaron2 wrote:
And if you look, you will not find me.

That's an oddly confident phrase, no? Where's he going to go? Why would the callee look? And if he looked, why would he fail?

... the world is too small to hide in, if you're limited to hiding in space.

The only place Aaron2 could go and be *guaranteed* he'd never be found is to a past farther back than anyone else can go...


I've convinced myself that the Aaron we see building the huge machine in a foreign country is Aaron2, who left the scene and who expressed his own fear of existing in someone else's past.

"You won't find me" because if you do track him to some odd corner of the world and find him, he'll enter his machine that can take him back weeks in time, and make sure that you never found him.
_________________
"Everybody's ignorant, only on different subjects." -- Will Rogers
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
foobario



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 133

PostPosted: Fri May 12, 2006 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good call, hal9000.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vode



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 323
Location: Hampton, UK

PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2006 7:41 am    Post subject: Yet another wild speculation about TGI Reply with quote

Thinking about the line "we didn't have any contact with him in the 3 hours", a completely different story behind TGI came to mind.

Aaron and Abe do one, maybe two, days of stock trading before Aaron finds Abe's failsafe. He goes back to Monday, sets up two new failsafes (in the same room and turned on at the same time), fixes the party and records the conversations of the day. This goes well, he carries on with the charade and repeats the first day of stock trading.

But then he has an idea. With a large stake he could make a lot more money. He approaches Granger and tells him about the boxes. Granger takes some convincing, but eventually agrees to provide the money on condition that he experiences time travel for himself.

Aaron 2 and Granger 1 go back in Aaron's failsafes to become Aaron 3 and Granger 2. Aaron has no qualms about stealing his previous self’s life but it’s not something that Granger had even considered. Aaron 3 convinces Granger 2 that this is the only way and helps him drug and lock away the original Granger.

On Thursday night, at around 11 o’clock, the original Granger escapes. He’s confused, someone has taken over his life, but he thinks that he recognised Aaron as one of his attackers so he heads over to Aaron’s house to confront him.

Granger 2 calls Aaron 3 to tell him that Granger 1 has escaped. Aaron 3 goes to Granger’s house and they search for Granger 1 but don’t find him. Aaron 3 returns home, shortly before 2 am. Granger 1 is outside in his car.

Unexpectedly Abe turns up. Granger 1 decides to wait and see what they’re up to. When they leave he follows them. He’s spotted and Aaron 3 makes up some story about seeing Thomas Granger at six that afternoon, and convinces Abe that this is a time travelling Granger. Everything that Aaron 3 says to Abe about Granger is BS apart from the slip about "contact with him in the 3 hours".


I know this is a ridiculously complicated explanation, and I’m not for one moment suggesting that this is what we’re supposed to believe happened, but it does show that there are possible explanations that don’t require that this Granger to have travelled from the future. The permutations are indeed endless.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
foobario



Joined: 07 Mar 2006
Posts: 133

PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2006 11:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow... good call, Vode. I like it.

The possible permutations *are* endless...

Note that this same scenario can play out with the 'consensus' timeline and an Aaron4 who travels from the future with Granger. When Abe reaches the back of the house, it is Aaron4 he finds... he's just decked Aaron3 and pushed him out of sight, and probably checked Granger into the fencepost for good measure. He's responsible for Granger coming back, so he knows how long Granger has been around.

It's interesting how many things don't add up in those scenes, as presented in the movie. Having 'unknowable' elements from the future is one thing, but we've also got Abe & Aaron making a logical error that will result in an unintended set of doubles (which leads in nicely to the 'legion' bit from the cast commentary), and Aaron either making an error in basic math or letting slip that he knows more about when Granger came back than he should.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stematwork



Joined: 07 Sep 2005
Posts: 23

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 9:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

i think vode has a very plausible explanation here...makes perfect sense.

in addition...if you guys would just relent from the linear view that there are only 3 or so Aaron's and Abe's and come over to my warped view that there truly are LEGIONS of copies due to an un-known amount of time loops, then everything would make sense.


stem
_________________
there is no fear in this dojo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Rob Y



Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 738

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 11:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

stematwork wrote:
in addition...if you guys would just relent from the linear view that there are only 3 or so Aaron's and Abe's and come over to my warped view that there truly are LEGIONS of copies due to an un-known amount of time loops, then everything would make sense.


How about if we said there are *at least* 3 Aarons and *at least* 2 Abes at the end of the movie, but possibly a whole army of them. I'd buy that.

However, I think that when Abe failsafed, he didn't just erase the Granger double, he erased a WHOLE LOT, including armies of Abes and Aarons. My personal speculation is that things really got out of hand after they went back and punched Platts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pedro2112



Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 456
Location: Midwest

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 11:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think Vode's explanation makes much sense from what we know. Let me explain..

Why would a non-time travelling Granger suggest that Abe and Aaron are "legion."

Second, and more important, why is it that Abe is the one that triggers the comas.
_________________
I'm in a groove.....

or is it a rut? - Neil Peart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vode



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 323
Location: Hampton, UK

PostPosted: Tue May 16, 2006 2:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not suggesting it makes any more sense than any other Granger theory. I'm firmly in the unknowable camp and this was just speculation about one way that Aaron could know where Granger was at 11 pm.

pedro2112 wrote:
Why would a non-time travelling Granger suggest that Abe and Aaron are "legion."


I don't know, but I'm sure I could come up with lots of alternatives that fit with any of the Granger theories. But since that line isn't in the film I'm not sure why it matters.

pedro2112 wrote:
Second, and more important, why is it that Abe is the one that triggers the comas.


Do we ever see this happen, or is it just more BS from Aaron.

There's only one thing I am sure of, if anyone ever does come up with an idea that explains everything we know about the Granger incident, it will be more complicated than any of have so far imagined.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rob Y



Joined: 15 May 2005
Posts: 738

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 10:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to be perverse, I'll add this to support vode's scenario....

We never see any future doubles pass out during the film (except failsafed Abe, but it makes sense because he's been drugged and in a box for 3 or 4 days)

However, we have lots of unconcious originals.

Maybe when a severe enough time paradox is created, it's the *original* who goes into a coma... I mean, we don't really know how this stuff works.

So maybe future double Granger came back 3 days earlier in the week, displaced his original, but didn't do a good enough job. So now unshaven *original* Granger is trailing Abe and Aaron around, just trying to figure out what's going on, but he passes out every time he gets around Abe because not only has he been displaced in his life, he's been displaced in time.

Aaron1 and Abe1 experience the exact same effect around their future doubles, but we can't tell because they are already gassed and drugged.

And Granger's comment "They are legion?" Simple. He's talking about the Romans.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
pedro2112



Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 456
Location: Midwest

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

vode wrote:


pedro2112 wrote:
Second, and more important, why is it that Abe is the one that triggers the comas.


Do we ever see this happen, or is it just more BS from Aaron.



I don't buy that. There is no suggestion in any of the commentary, movie or interview that the narration is anything other than what had happened to Aaron2. Carruth states clearly that all the answers are in the movie to solve the various puzzles. That would be impossible if the narration was a lie.

I think it's clear that whatever the "answer" is to the Granger Incident, it involves Abe heavily.
_________________
I'm in a groove.....

or is it a rut? - Neil Peart
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
vode



Joined: 28 Jan 2005
Posts: 323
Location: Hampton, UK

PostPosted: Wed May 17, 2006 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rob Y wrote:
Just to be perverse, I'll add this to support vode's scenario....


I'll be even more perverse and say I don't really support it myself.

My earlier posting wasn't meant to be taken that seriously, it was just posted to illustrate that there's very little we know for sure about the Granger incident, and almost any explanation is just as good as any other. There's as much disinformation as there is information, in the film and commentary, so it's probably impossible to come up with anything that fits perfectly.

What I was hoping was that my idea would be the first of many that treated the 3 hours line as true and other bits as false. Then we could see which one we liked best.

But thanks anyway for the support, and thanks too for pulling it apart.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    PrimerMovie.com Forum Index -> Movie Discussion All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB 2.0.14 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Catapult Digital Distribution      ERBP